I want to talk about Rule 14e-3, because it has significant implications for insider trading liability. But to do that, we first have to talk about tender offers, and what they are.
Phil Mickelson, whom the SEC describes as a “successful professional golfer,” was not charged with insider trading earlier today. I wasn’t either, and I’m glad about that. And you probably weren’t either! High fives all around. But mostly, Phil wasn’t charged, and he’s really glad, because that guy was %$&*@! close to being charged with… Continue Reading
Can you resolve your insider trading case with a negligence-based charge? Probably not. If you’re lucky enough to get there, it’ll only be after a long, painful fight.
More cowbell, more misappropriation theory.
Welcome back to the Insider Trading Cartoon Series. To explore the misappropriation doctrine further, we present another scenario full of risk to people who are too willing to take advantage of unexpected access to material, nonpublic information.
I shouldn’t write this post, because the SEC surely wants me to write at least part of it. I mean, they don’t care about what I write; I can promise you that. But they want somebody to cover it because of the message they hope to send to people out there who are thinking about… Continue Reading
One other interesting thing coming out of last Friday’s enforcement discussion at SEC Speaks (there weren’t many): Market Abuse Unit co-chief Rob Cohen’s mention of the SEC’s Analysis and Detection Center. First, though, a brief rundown on how the SEC has traditionally started insider trading cases. In short, they tend to come from outside reports… Continue Reading
We’ve spent a few episodes talking about insider trading when the trader owes a fiduciary duty to the company whose securities are being traded. But what if the trader isn’t connected to the company? Enter the misappropriation theory of insider trading liability:
Having covered corporate officers and temporary insiders, we now turn briefly to regular employees, still under the classical theory of insider trading liability.
In the last episode of the Insider Trading Cartoon Series, we discussed temporary insiders and their potential liability for insider trading. But what about those with more tenuous connections to the companies at issue? That’s the topic in Volume III of the series.
In Volume II of our new series, we look at temporary insiders — who they are and how they can become liable for insider trading.
We’re trying something new here at Cady Bar the Door. Below is the first volume of what I hope will be a long-running animation series on insider trading. The first episode describes and portrays the classical theory of insider trading, also known as the abstain-or-disclose theory. We may try series on other topics as well…. Continue Reading
The law surrounding short swing trading under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act can be hard. But the basics are relatively easy. So easy, in fact, that cartoon characters can lay it out for you in three minutes and 19 seconds. Take it away, Sally and Mr. CEO:
This is almost certainly not true anymore. But it was true once! Maybe only once. Back in October 1991, the SEC sued Shared Medical Systems, a Pennsylvania health care information services company and three of its officers and directors: the company for financial reporting fraud and the individuals for insider trading, among other things. Here’s… Continue Reading
I haven’t yet turned to a life of crime, so far be it from me to criticize actual criminals’ profit-maximizing strategies. It’s easy for me to nitpick, but I’m not the one strapping on my mask and trying to earn a (dis)honest dollar every day. But have a look at this Reuters story from Tuesday…. Continue Reading
A couple of weeks ago I expressed skepticism about the ultimate impact of Judge Rakoff’s recent opinion in SEC v. Payton. In it, he held that for purposes of a motion to dismiss, the SEC had adequately alleged insider trading violations in a remote tippee context, even after the Second Circuit’s decision in United States… Continue Reading
It strikes me that two civil regulators are facing dire attacks on aspects of their enforcement programs – both in different U.S. Courts of Appeals – at the same time. Both of these attacks arise out of generalized statutes that only sort of address the problems the regulators seek to remedy. To some degree, how… Continue Reading
Insider trading prosecutions can be difficult. Because of the haphazard and tortuous growth of insider trading law itself, the prosecutions involve proving lots of different pesky elements. Fiduciary duties, materiality, trading . . . . Ugh, the trading. And the materiality! So annoying! If you were a prosecutor, how liberating it would be to bring… Continue Reading
As you probably know if you’re reading this, in December the Second Circuit upended insider trading law for “tipping” cases by (1) giving some structure to the definition of the personal benefit that must come to the original tipper, and (2) requiring that tippees farther down the chain know exactly what the original tipper’s personal… Continue Reading
In the wake of the Second Circuit’s huge remote tippee insider trading decision from two weeks ago in United States v. Newman, three more things occur to me. To recap, the court held that to be liable for insider trading in a tipper/tippee context, (1) a tippee must know about the personal benefit received by… Continue Reading
Matt Levine is a big jerk. He just sits there at Bloomberg following events in finance and securities enforcement, and then writes interesting things about those events really quickly and with insight that no one else has thought of yet. It’s so obnoxious. Today he struck again with this piece about the Second Circuit’s huge… Continue Reading
In the right kind of enforcement action, the SEC can take the money it’s generated and set up what’s called a Fair Fund to redistribute that money to harmed investors. But what is the right kind of case? This procedure was established as part of the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley law, and it’s relatively easy to contemplate… Continue Reading
You remember Rengan Rajaratnam, right? He broke the S.D.N.Y.’s long streak of insider trading victories when a jury acquitted him in July. I wondered what the effect on his case with the SEC would be. Would he settle? Would he take that one to trial and win, too? Well, he and the SEC came to… Continue Reading
It never actually became a case, but maybe you remember this matter from a few years ago. In January 2011, former Berkshire Hathaway executive David Sokol bought about 100,000 shares in Lubrizol Corporation shortly before suggesting to Warren Buffett that Berkshire consider acquiring the company. Berkshire did acquire Lubrizol on March 14th, and the company’s… Continue Reading